<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cassie &#8211; &#8220;Must Be Love&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seanjohn.com/blog/2009/06/cassie-must-be-love/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seanjohn.com/blog/2009/06/cassie-must-be-love/</link>
	<description>No BitchAssNess Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 08:00:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: soundabstract</title>
		<link>http://www.seanjohn.com/blog/2009/06/cassie-must-be-love/comment-page-1/#comment-560</link>
		<dc:creator>soundabstract</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seanjohn.com/blog/?p=502#comment-560</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t say this to be negative, but I hope you didn&#039;t spend more than five grand for this video. Another thing, weak representation of what you are attempting to convey. Example: &quot;If you watch this video, first, without sound, then, with sound, see if you get the same message.&quot; Honestly, it conveyed more about sensuality and sex, than it did love. Be careful not to confuse the matter. Sean, I think you can do better than this, but, if this is a &quot;creative vision,&quot; and I were at where you were at, you know and I know you don&#039;t need to waste time -money- on making substandard work. &quot;If&quot; you wanted to show off your trophy girl, shouldn&#039;t the song be more along those lines? Sure, make-up makes her look good, sure she can shake her but, sure a studio can make both of you sound good, but really now. Re-evaluate this video. If your only reason was to throw something out there to make money, then you got it. My final thought is this, &quot;I could have shot this in a local ghetto of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, using a digital camera purchased at a pawnshop, and music equivalent to this on a copy of FL7 and Protools. I remember, Sean, where you said the music industry is suffering. Well, her is a prime example of why. You can&#039;t just slap shit together and think that it&#039;s hot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t say this to be negative, but I hope you didn&#8217;t spend more than five grand for this video. Another thing, weak representation of what you are attempting to convey. Example: &#8220;If you watch this video, first, without sound, then, with sound, see if you get the same message.&#8221; Honestly, it conveyed more about sensuality and sex, than it did love. Be careful not to confuse the matter. Sean, I think you can do better than this, but, if this is a &#8220;creative vision,&#8221; and I were at where you were at, you know and I know you don&#8217;t need to waste time -money- on making substandard work. &#8220;If&#8221; you wanted to show off your trophy girl, shouldn&#8217;t the song be more along those lines? Sure, make-up makes her look good, sure she can shake her but, sure a studio can make both of you sound good, but really now. Re-evaluate this video. If your only reason was to throw something out there to make money, then you got it. My final thought is this, &#8220;I could have shot this in a local ghetto of Pine Bluff, Arkansas, using a digital camera purchased at a pawnshop, and music equivalent to this on a copy of FL7 and Protools. I remember, Sean, where you said the music industry is suffering. Well, her is a prime example of why. You can&#8217;t just slap shit together and think that it&#8217;s hot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

